Date Libraries

Moment vs date-fns vs Day.js

The JavaScript date library landscape — why Moment is declining and what to use instead

momentdate-fnsdayjs

Weekly Downloads — Last 6 Months

moment

v2.30.1

Parse, validate, manipulate, and display dates

Weekly

28.6M

Monthly

115.9M

Growth

+4%

Bundle (gzip)

75.4 kB

date-fns

v4.1.0

Modern JavaScript date utility library

Weekly

46.3M

Monthly

187.1M

Growth

+18%

Bundle (gzip)

17.1 kB

dayjs

v1.11.19

2KB immutable date time library alternative to Moment.js with the same modern API

Weekly

36.8M

Monthly

148.2M

Growth

+21%

Bundle (gzip)

3.0 kB

Package Breakdown

moment

The original JavaScript date library — now in maintenance mode

✓ Best For

Maintaining existing Moment codebases only — not recommended for new projects

✗ Weakness

67kB gzipped, mutable, not tree-shakeable, officially in maintenance mode

date-fns

Functional, tree-shakeable date utilities for modern JavaScript

✓ Best For

Projects using tree-shaking, TypeScript projects (excellent types), functional programming style, and when you only need a subset of date functions

✗ Weakness

More verbose API than Moment or Day.js, no plugin system

dayjsRecommended

2kB Moment.js alternative with a compatible API

✓ Best For

Migrating from Moment.js, projects needing a small bundle footprint, and teams who prefer Moment's chaining API over functional style

✗ Weakness

Plugin system required for advanced features, smaller than date-fns for complex needs

Which Date Library Should You Use in 2026?

For new projects, the choice is between date-fns and Day.js. Use date-fns if you're TypeScript-heavy and want the most comprehensive, tree-shakeable solution. Use Day.js if you want the smallest possible bundle or are migrating from Moment.js.

Do not use Moment.js for new projects. The maintainers themselves have deprecated it. The bundle cost alone is reason enough, but the mutability issues and lack of tree-shaking make it the wrong choice by any modern metric.

For migrating existing Moment.js code, Day.js is the fastest path — most code works with only import changes.

Recommended: dayjs

Smallest bundle (2kB), Moment-compatible API for easy migration, and growing faster than date-fns.

Which to Use For Each Use Case

Use CaseWinner
New project, need date formattingdayjs
TypeScript project with complex date logicdate-fns
Migrating from Moment.jsdayjs
Need only 2-3 date functionsdate-fns

FAQ

Is Moment.js dead?+
Moment is in maintenance mode — it receives security fixes but no new features. The Moment team explicitly recommends migrating to alternatives. It's not 'dead' in the sense that it still works, but for new projects it's the wrong choice. The high download numbers are entirely legacy projects that haven't migrated yet.
How hard is it to migrate from Moment to Day.js?+
Very easy for most cases. Day.js was designed to be Moment API-compatible. In most codebases, you change the import from 'moment' to 'dayjs' and the code works. Advanced Moment features (specific locales, timezone support) require Day.js plugins, but these are well-documented and easy to add.
Should I use date-fns or Day.js?+
date-fns if: you use TypeScript heavily, you only need a subset of date functions (tree-shaking helps), or you prefer functional programming patterns. Day.js if: bundle size is critical (2kB vs 12-40kB for date-fns depending on what you import), you're migrating from Moment, or you prefer the chaining API style.
What about the native JavaScript Temporal API?+
The Temporal API is a modern replacement for JavaScript's built-in Date object and is advancing through TC39 standardization. When it lands in all browsers (likely 2026-2027), it may reduce the need for date libraries entirely. Until then, date-fns and Day.js remain the practical choices.

Related Comparisons

Moment.js was the definitive JavaScript date library for nearly a decade. Its comprehensive API, reliable parsing, and broad compatibility made it the default choice for any date manipulation need. But Moment has a critical flaw by modern standards — it's mutable and ships 67kB gzipped, an enormous cost for a utility library. The Moment team itself declared the library in maintenance mode in 2020 and recommends alternatives.

This comparison tells one of the clearest stories in the npm trends dataset: Moment's absolute download numbers remain high (legacy projects haven't switched), but the trend line is declining while date-fns and Day.js are both growing. New projects are not choosing Moment.

The Decline of Moment and Rise of Alternatives

Moment's problems became apparent as JavaScript ecosystem priorities shifted. Tree-shaking became standard — but Moment can't be tree-shaken because it extends a single object. Bundle size became a key metric — Moment's 67kB gzip cost is hard to justify for date formatting. Immutability became a best practice — Moment mutates dates in place, causing subtle bugs.

date-fns addressed all three: it's fully tree-shakeable (only import what you use), immutable, and provides a functional programming model where every function takes a date and returns a new date. The tradeoff is a more verbose API — instead of moment(date).add(1, 'day').format('MM/DD/YYYY'), you chain individual functions.

Day.js chose a different tradeoff: maintain Moment's familiar API (so migration is trivial) but rebuild it as a 2kB immutable library. Most Moment code works in Day.js with only import changes. This Moment API compatibility made it the easiest migration path and drove rapid adoption.

Compare Any Packages

Search any npm package and build your own custom comparison.

Open npm Trends Tool