← Back to Blog

Code Review Red Flags: What Senior Developers Look For and Why

code review red flags

Every code review is a chance to prevent a ticking time bomb from sneaking into your system. When the code isn’t carefully examined, minor oversights turn into technical debt, integration issues, and long-term headaches for the whole team. That’s why experienced code reviewers treat every line of code like it matters.

In software development, a code review is more than a gatekeeping ritual. It’s a structured conversation between a software developer, a tech lead, and often a new team member learning the ropes. The goal isn’t just to approve pull requests with a quick “lgtm.” It’s to protect the codebase, improve development practices, and raise team morale.

This article will walk you through the seven red flags that indicate problems in a code review process, highlight what senior developers really focus on, and share best practices for building a strong review culture that drives continuous improvement.

What is Code Review?

A code review is the systematic examination of every code change made in a project. The purpose is simple: maintain code quality, reduce the risk of technical issues, and support scalable development cycles.

When done well, code reviews achieve three things:

Think of it as a defensive layer around your codebases. Without it, you’re leaving the quality of the code to chance.

Importance of Identifying Red Flags

Ignoring red flags in reviews leads directly to poor code and costly refactoring later. When a development team overlooks problems in pull requests, the risk of technical debt multiplies.

Recognizing red flags early allows you to:

In short: catching issues in review protects your scalable development future.

Seven Red Flags to Look For in Code Reviews

1. Inconsistent Coding Standards

When developers ignore established patterns, the result is inconsistent code. This makes the project harder to debug, harder to scale, and much less maintainable.

function calcprice(qty , Price){
return qty*Price
}

Senior developers expect consistent coding standards because they reduce friction. Good code should be easy to read by anyone on the team, not just the original author.


2. Lack of Error Handling

One of the most obvious red flags is code without proper error handling. Without it, user data is at risk, APIs fail silently, and the team needs to spend more time firefighting.

response = requests.get("https://api.example.com/data")
data = response.json()  # crashes if response fails

Great code anticipates failure. Whether the code is handling a failed network request, invalid input, or a missing dependency, reviewers want to see clear handling strategies.


3. Poorly Named Variables

Sloppy variable names or weak naming conventions make the quality of the code plummet. Senior developers know that 200-300 lines of logic are unreadable without clear identifiers.

x := 25
y := 5
z := x / y

Every code change should demonstrate thoughtful naming. This keeps the codebase maintainable, lowers the risk of technical confusion, and saves time in future technical discussions.


4. Complex Logic Without Explanation

Unexplained logic is another red flag that can lead to slow onboarding for a new team member. If reviewers have to debug to understand intent, the author hasn’t done their job.

if (($a && !$b) || (!$a && $c && $d)) {
  // do something
}

When you explain complex logic with comments, diagrams, or docstrings, you make knowledge sharing effortless and raise the bar for the whole team.


5. Low Test Coverage

A software engineer who ships without tests is gambling with production. Test coverage proves the quality of the code and prevents regressions when you add new features.

public int add(int a, int b) {
    return a + b;
}
// No tests written

A development team that ignores coverage metrics is writing a future full of support tickets. Strong testing culture equals stronger software.


6. Performance Issues

Performance issues are often invisible until the system is under load. In reviews, look for code that could lead to slow queries, excessive memory use, or unnecessary loops.

Senior developers are trained to spot inefficiencies. One line of code can create a ticking time bomb if it scales poorly with production data.


7. Security Vulnerabilities

No review is complete without asking: is there a vulnerability here? Security vulnerabilities put user data and business trust at risk.

db.query(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`);

Whether it’s SQL injection, poor input validation, or unsafe dependency use, this is where tools like Pacgie shine. By scanning dependencies directly from GitHub repos or uploaded files, Pacgie helps you proactively address security before it’s too late.


Best Practices for Code Review

Regularly Review Pull Requests

A backlog of pull requests slows down development cycles. Regularly review submissions to keep momentum high and the positive team culture intact.

Encourage Knowledge Sharing

The best code review practices foster collaboration. Junior developers should always learn something new from review comments. A positive team environment encourages growth and builds better developers.

Focus on Maintainability and Scalability

Code should be maintainable and scalable. Ask: will this hold up when the team composition changes, or when the product must support millions of users? Scalable development starts with good code today.

Common Mistakes Developers Skip During Code Review

Even seasoned developers skip certain checks:

1. Forgetting to Check for Integration Issues

A pull request might look clean in isolation but cause breakage once merged with the main codebase. Missing imports, incompatible API versions, or clashing dependencies create silent integration issues that don’t show up until deployment.

 A developer adds a new logging library that conflicts with an existing dependency. Everything passes locally, but CI/CD fails because of version mismatches.

This is where tools like Pacgie make a difference. By scanning dependencies, Pacgie flags outdated or incompatible libraries that could destabilize your build. Instead of firefighting after release, you proactively address issues during review.

2. Approving Poor Code Because the Author is Under Deadline Pressure

When a project deadline looms, there’s a temptation to hit “approve” even on poor code just to ship new features faster. Reviewers rationalize it with “we’ll refactor later,” but later rarely comes.

Consequences:

A tech lead should resist the urge to rush. Remember: shipping bad changes to meet today’s deadline will cost exponentially more in support tickets and fixes tomorrow.

3. Ignoring Communication Styles that Cause Friction in Technical Discussions

Code reviews are not just about the quality of the code — they’re about the whole team dynamic. When reviewers give blunt or dismissive feedback, they create friction that discourages collaboration.

When code reviewers focus on clarity and respect, junior developers are more likely to learn something new. Positive team culture depends on recognizing that communication styles shape how feedback is received.

4. Overlooking Refactoring Opportunities Because the Code “Works”

One of the most dangerous blind spots is approving code without suggesting refactoring just because it “runs.” Functionality is not the same as good code.

// Works, but hard to maintain
function calc(a, b, c, d, e, f) {
  return (a + b) * (c / d) - (e * f);
}

Instead of approving, a reviewer should ask for clearer structure and variable names:

function calculateAdjustedValue(price, tax, discount, divisor, penalty, multiplier) {
  const base = (price + tax) * (discount / divisor);
  return base - (penalty * multiplier);
}

Skipping refactoring is a missed chance for continuous improvement. Over time, these shortcuts pile up into massive technical debt that undermines scalability.


Conclusion

A strong code review culture is one of the most valuable assets a development team can build. By recognizing red flags like inconsistent code to hidden security vulnerabilities, you protect your codebase, safeguard user data, and ensure future scalability.

When you partner with tools like Pacgie, you don’t just spot red flags that indicate problems in your dependencies; you proactively address them. Pacgie integrates directly with your repos, helps you reduce technical debt, and supports continuous improvement across the whole team.

At the end of the day, senior developers aren’t looking for perfection in every code review. They’re looking for signs of discipline, foresight, and care. When you build on those foundations, your team morale improves, your product becomes more maintainable, and you deliver new features with confidence.

FAQ

What are code review red flags?

They are warning signs in code such as missing error handling, weak naming conventions, or hidden security vulnerabilities that signal future risks.

How can I improve my code review process?

Adopt best practices, encourage knowledge sharing, and make sure your code review practices emphasize maintainability and scalability.

What should I do if I find a red flag during a review?


Provide constructive review comments, suggest refactoring, and explain why the change matters for the whole team.

Why is test coverage important in code reviews?


Test coverage proves the quality of the code, prevents regressions, and reduces the chance of creating support tickets later